.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
When Useful Clinical AI Exceeds Meaningful Oversight
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
J
R
DOI：10.1007/s10916-026-02446-6.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Human oversight is widely invoked as a safeguard in clinical AI, yet it is often treated as a single, stable property. In practice, clinicians remain responsible for AI-assisted decisions without remaining able to meaningfully review the basis of the output. This tension becomes sharper as systems become multimodal, agentic, and cognitively ambitious. We propose a distinction between cognitive and normative oversight and discuss its implications for AI evaluation and deployment.
Journal
IF:
5.7
Papers:
3.5K
Citations:
7.9K
Organization
Cited Papers