.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Why Do Civil War Successor Parties Renounce Violence?
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
J
DOI：10.1086/732958.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Why do civil war successor parties (CWSPs) renounce the use of violence as a political tool after civil wars end? If they renounce violence, this is an indicator of their successful transition to democratic competition. I explore a variety of factors that may incentivize a CWSP to renounce violence as a political tactic. These include whether the CWSP is likely to participate in competitive elections, the strength of party organization, the intensity and duration of the previous civil war, and whether the party faces an environment of electoral violence. Using data from the Varieties of Democracy-Parties dataset and other data sources, I find that electoral incentives are related to the renunciation of violence and the threat of electoral violence is negatively related to renunciation. Strength of organization is also negatively related to the renunciation of violence. The implications of these findings are then discussed.
Keywords:
civil war successor parties
renounce violence
rebel party organization
civil war
political parties
Journal
IF:
3.8
Papers:
5.8K
Citations:
1.3W
Organization
Cited Papers