arrow
Return

Why Do Tree Ensemble Approximators Not Outperform the Recursive-Rule eXtraction Algorithm?

delete2024-03-16
delete2
delete
OA
AI
S
Soma Onishi
M
Masahiro Nishimura
R
Ryota Fujimura
H
Hayashi, Yoichi *
DOI:10.3390/make6010031delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Although machine learning models are widely used in critical domains, their complexity and poor interpretability remain problematic. Decision trees (DTs) and rule-based models are known for their interpretability, and numerous studies have investigated techniques for approximating tree ensembles using DTs or rule sets, even though these approximators often overlook interpretability. These methods generate three types of rule sets: DT based, unordered, and decision list based. However, very few metrics exist that can distinguish and compare these rule sets. Therefore, the present study proposes an interpretability metric to allow for comparisons of interpretability between different rule sets and investigates the interpretability of the rules generated by the tree ensemble approximators. We compare these rule sets with the Recursive-Rule eXtraction algorithm (Re-RX) with J48graft to offer insights into the interpretability gap. The results indicate that Re-RX with J48graft can handle categorical and numerical attributes separately, has simple rules, and achieves a high interpretability, even when the number of rules is large. RuleCOSI+, a state-of-the-art method, showed significantly lower results regarding interpretability, but had the smallest number of rules.
Keywords:
interpretable machine learning
explainable artificial intelligence
rule extraction
rule-based model
decision list
decision tree
tree ensemble approximator

Journal

M
Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction
IF:
6
Papers:
834
Citations:
1.8K

Organization

M
Meiji University
Scholars:
1.9K
Papers: 1.5K
Citations: 1.1K
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Can Anthropometry and Body Composition Explain Physical Fitness Levels in School-Aged Children?
err2021-05-31
err0
errOAAI
errChih-Yu Hsu; Liang-Sien Chen; I-Jen Chang; Wei-Ching Fang; Sun-Weng Huang; Rong-Ho Lin; Steve Wen-Neng Ueng; Hai-Hua Chuang
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
Beyond explaining: Opportunities and challenges of XAI-based model improvement
err2023-04-01
err38
errOAAI
errWeber, Leander; Lapuschkin, Sebastian; Binder, Alexander; Samek, Wojciech
errShare
errSave
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) 2.0: A manifesto of open challenges and interdisciplinary research directions
err2024-06-01
err49
errOAAI
errLongo, Luca; Brcic, Mario; Cabitza, Federico; Choi, Jaesik; Confalonieri, Roberto; Del Ser, Javier; Guidotti, Riccardo; Hayashi, Yoichi; Herrera, Francisco; Holzinger, Andreas; Jiang, Richard; Khosravi, Hassan; Lecue, Freddy; Malgieri, Gianclaudio; Paez, Andres; Samek, Wojciech; Schneider, Johannes; Speith, Timo; Stumpf, Simone
errShare
errSave
Efficacy and safety of danoprevir plus sofosbuvir in GT 1, 2, 3, or 6 chronic hepatitis C patients with or without cirrhosis in China
err2021-06-18
err0
errOAAI
errShufang Pan; Kai Feng; Ping Huang; Yingfu Zeng; Liu Ke; Xiaodong Yang; Jing Liu; Chaoshuang Lin
errShare
errSave
researcher View more