.png){kind=icon}
Return
Why quantum probability does not explain the conjunction fallacy
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1017/S0140525X12003123.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
We agree with Pothos & Busemeyer (P&B) that formal tools can be fruitfully employed to model human judgment under uncertainty, including well-known departures from principles of classical probability. However, existing findings either contradict P&B's quantum probability approach or support it to a limited extent. The conjunction fallacy serves as a key illustration of both kinds of problems.
Keywords:
CONFIRMATION
ERRORS
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
13.7
Papers:
1.6W
Citations:
1.2W
Organization
Cited Papers
ShareSaveThe Diagnosis, Occurrence and Distribution of Sheep Pulmonary Adenomatosis in Scotland 1975 to 1981
PREAI
ShareSave
ShareSaveEffects of experimental manipulation of inflorescence size on pollination and pre-dispersal seed predation in the hummingbird-pollinated plant Ipomopsis aggregata.png)
Oecologia
OecologiaIF0
PREAI
ShareSave no more
no more