.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Why Some Persistent Problems Persist
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1017/S0003055419000364.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Recent work on counter-insurgency, client states, foreign aid, and proxy wars uses a principal-agent framework to study the principal's ability to induce an agent to exert effort on the principal's behalf. This work broadly emphasizes the moral hazard problem and the actors' limited commitment power. The latter is usually addressed through the logic of repeated games in which reneging on an agreement triggers future punishment. This study analyzes a related incentive problem that undermines the principal's ability to induce an agent to exert effort on its behalf. The repeated-game's enforcement mechanismtends to breakdownif the principal is trying to get the agent to resolve a problem that, if resolved, (i) creates an ongoing problem for the agent and (ii) simultaneously significantly reduces the agent's ability to impose future costs on the principal. The principal cannot induce the agent to exert much effort in these circumstances, and the problem persists.
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
5.8
Papers:
8.7K
Citations:
2.1W
