.png){kind=icon}
返回
Accommodating satisficing behaviour in stated choice experiments
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1093/erae/jby021.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Accumulating evidence suggests that respondents in stated choice experiments use simplifying strategies. Such behaviour is a deviation from random utility theory and can lead to wrong inferences regarding preferences. This is a first attempt to systematically explore satisficing in stated choice experiments. We consider 944 satisficing rules and allow respondents to revise the rules adopted throughout the choice sequence. Only a minority of respondents used the same satisficing rule across the entire sequence. Allowing for updating reveals that the use of the heuristic changes over the choice sequence. Considering satisficing behaviour leads to improved model fits and different marginal willingness-to-pay estimates.
Keyword:
random utility maximisation
satisficing
stated choice experiments
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.5
论文数:
1.4K
被引数:
2.2K
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容