.png){kind=icon}
返回
An Empirical Study Comparing Two Automatic Graders for Programming. MOOCs Context
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_57.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
The present paper compares Algo+, an assessment tool for computer programs, to an automatic grader used in a MOOC course at EPFL. This empirical study explores the practicability and the behaviour of Algo+ and analyses whether Algo+ can be used to evaluate a large scale of programs. Algo+ is a prototype based on a static analysis approach for automated assessment of algorithms where programs are not executed but analysed by looking at their instructions. The second tool, EPFL grader, is used to grade programs submitted by students in MOOCs of Introductory programming with C++ at EPFL and is based on a compiler approach. In this technique submissions are assessed via a battery of unit tests where the student program is run with standard input and assessed on whether they produced the correct output.
Keyword:
Computer education
MOOCs
Assessment
Automated grading
Programming education
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
D
IF:
0
论文数:
1
被引数:
0
机构
引用论文
Polystyrene nanoplastics penetrate across the blood-brain barrier and induce activation of microglia in the brain of mice.png)
Chemosphere
ChemosphereIF0
PREAI
分享收藏A Framework for Modeling, Simulation and Automatic Code Generation of Sensor Network Application
PREAI
分享收藏