返回
An Ensemble Architecture for Learning Complex Problem-Solving Techniques from Demonstration
DOI:10.1145/2337542.2337560.png)
摘要
En 中文
We present a novel ensemble architecture for learning problem-solving techniques from a very small number of expert solutions and demonstrate its effectiveness in a complex real-world domain. The key feature of our Generalized Integrated Learning Architecture (GILA) is a set of heterogeneous independent learning and reasoning (ILR) components, coordinated by a central meta-reasoning executive (MRE). The ILRs are weakly coupled in the sense that all coordination during learning and performance happens through the MRE. Each ILR learns independently from a small number of expert demonstrations of a complex task. During performance, each ILR proposes partial solutions to subproblems posed by the MRE, which are then selected from and pieced together by the MRE to produce a complete solution. The heterogeneity of the learner-reasoners allows both learning and problem solving to be more effective because their abilities and biases are complementary and synergistic. We describe the application of this novel learning and problem solving architecture to the domain of airspace management, where multiple requests for the use of airspaces need to be deconflicted, reconciled, and managed automatically. Formal evaluations show that our system performs as well as or better than humans after learning from the same training data. Furthermore, GILA outperforms any individual ILR run in isolation, thus demonstrating the power of the ensemble architecture for learning and problem solving.
Keyword:
Design
Algorithms
Experimentation
Performance
Ensemble architecture
learning from demonstration
complex problem-solving
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
6.6
论文数:
1.5K
被引数:
6.2K
机构
引用论文
A review and empirical evaluation of feature weighting methods for a class of lazy learning algorithms一类懒惰学习算法的特征加权方法综述与实证评价
An experimental comparison of three methods for constructing ensembles of decision trees: Bagging, boosting, and randomization
MACHINE LEARNING
IF2.9

