.png){kind=icon}
返回
Are LULUs still enduringly objectionable?
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1080/09640568.2011.623070.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
We asked a national sample of 651 US residents about the feelings, emotions, images and colours they associated with nearby waste management, energy, industrial facilities and other big developments commonly regarded as locally unwanted land uses (LULUs). The respondents showed the expected dislike of them, picking 'bad', 'fear', 'polluted', red and black to describe them more than 'safe', 'secure', 'jobs' and other positive descriptors and images. Waste management facilities, especially nuclear ones, had the most negative labels, and coal and gas energy facilities had fewer than anticipated. This survey occurred prior to the events in the Fukushima plant in Japan. However, even before those events LULU concerns endured and nuclear facilities and chemical and metal plants were the most distressing to the public as a whole.
Keyword:
affect heuristic
LULUs
TOADS
NIMBY
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.6
论文数:
2.1K
被引数:
6.0K
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏
分享收藏
查看更多内容