.png){kind=icon}
返回
Argumentation: Its adaptiveness and efficacy
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1017/S0140525X10003031.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Having defended the usefulness of our definition of reasoning, we stress that reasoning is not only for convincing but also for evaluating arguments, and that as such it has an epistemic function. We defend the evidence supporting the theory against several challenges: People are good informal arguers, they reason better in groups, and they have a confirmation bias. Finally, we consider possible extensions, first in terms of process-level theories of reasoning, and second in the effects of reasoning outside the lab.
Keyword:
INVOLVEMENT
PERSUASION
VIGILANCE
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
13.7
论文数:
1.6W
被引数:
1.2W
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏
分享收藏
查看更多内容