arrow
返回

Assessing Intervention Timing in Computer-Based Education Using Machine Learning Algorithms

delete2014-01-01
delete29
delete
OA
AI
A
Alexander J. Stimpson *
M
Mary L. Cummings
DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2014.2303071delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
The use of computer-based and online education systems has made new data available that can describe the temporal and process-level progression of learning. To date, machine learning research has not considered the impacts of these properties on the machine learning prediction task in educational settings. Machine learning algorithms may have applications in supporting targeted intervention approaches. The goals of this paper are to: 1) determine the impact of process-level information on machine learning prediction results and 2) establish the effect of type of machine learning algorithm used on prediction results. Data were collected from a university level course in human factors engineering (n = 35), which included both traditional classroom assessment and computer-based assessment methods. A set of common regression and classification algorithms were applied to the data to predict final course score. The overall prediction accuracy as well as the chronological progression of prediction accuracy was analyzed for each algorithm. Simple machine learning algorithms (linear regression, logistic regression) had comparable performance with more complex methods (support vector machines, artificial neural networks). Process-level information was not useful in post-hoc predictions, but contributed significantly to allowing for accurate predictions to be made earlier in the course. Process level information provides useful prediction features for development of targeted intervention techniques, as it allows more accurate predictions to be made earlier in the course. For small course data sets, the prediction accuracy and simplicity of linear regression and logistic regression make these methods preferable to more complex algorithms.
Keyword:
Machine learning
training
decision support systems
educational technology
statistical learning
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

IEEE Access 封面图
IEEE Access
IF:
3.6
论文数:
9.8W
被引数:
29.4W

机构

D
Duke University
学者数:
6.3W
论文数: 5.7W
被引数: 6.5W
引用论文

引用论文

err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
err2000-01-01
err0
PREAI
errMaria Claudia C. Ruvolo-Takasusuki
err分享
err收藏
Gender Differences in Recovery From Sports-Related Concussion in Adolescents
err2015-09-15
err0
PREAI
errJohn G. Baker; John J. Leddy; Scott R. Darling; Jennifer Shucard; Michael Makdissi; Barry S. Willer
err分享
err收藏
Online Learning Based on Essential Concepts and Formative Assessment
err2013-01-02
err60
PREAI
errLawton, Daryl; Vye, Nancy; Bransford, John; Sanders, Elizabeth; Richey, Michael; French, David; Stephens, Rick
err分享
err收藏
Characterisation of B.1.1.7 and Pangolin coronavirus spike provides insights on the evolutionary trajectory of SARS-CoV-2
err
IF0
err2021-03-22
err0
errOAAI
errSamuel J. Dicken; Matthew J. Murray; Lucy G. Thorne; Ann-Kathrin Reuschl; Calum Forrest; Maaroothen Ganeshalingham; Luke Muir; Mphatso D. Kalemera; Machaela Palor; Laura E. McCoy; Clare Jolly; Greg J. Towers; Matthew B. Reeves; Joe Grove
err分享
err收藏
没有更多内容