arrow
返回

Auditor Information Foraging Behavior

delete2016-10-01
delete18
PRE
AI
B
Benjamin P. Commerford *
R
Richard C. Hatfield
R
Richard W. Houston
C
Curtis Mullis
DOI:10.2308/accr-51628delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
In this study, we examine how information foraging by auditors affects audit evidence collection in two distinct contexts, and show how a small change to audit methodology mitigates the potentially harmful effects of foraging. Information Foraging Theory explains how, while navigating an information environment, individuals learn to acquire information through personally experiencing the costs incurred and the values obtained from information. Consistent with the theory, we find that auditors react to the immediately felt costs of information collection (e.g., time and effort) at the expense of a more global consideration of information value (i.e., auditors collect lower-quality audit evidence). However, foraging behavior is moderated by removing the personal cost to the individual auditor (identifying audit evidence for another member of the audit team to collect), further demonstrating that these personally felt costs influence auditor choices in a way that reduces the quality of information collected. We contribute to the literature by demonstrating how information foraging can influence evidence quality and, thus, audit quality, and how a slight alteration of audit methodology can mitigate this behavior.
Keyword:
auditing
evidence collection
information foraging
sampling
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Accounting Review 封面图
Accounting Review
IF:
4.4
论文数:
2.4K
被引数:
2.0W

机构

University of Alabama System 封面图
University of Alabama System
学者数:
4.2W
论文数: 3.7W
被引数: 68
U
university of alabama tuscaloosa
学者数:
5.2K
论文数: 4.5K
被引数: 11
U
University of Kentucky
学者数:
2.5W
论文数: 2.1W
被引数: 41
学者 查看更多机构