arrow
返回

AUTOMATICITY - A NEW FRAMEWORK FOR DYSLEXIA RESEARCH

delete1990-05-01
delete408
PRE
AI
R
R.I. Nicolson
A
Angela J. Fawcett
DOI:10.1016/0010-0277(90)90013-Adelete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
The performance of a group of 23 13-year-old dyslexic children was compared with that of same-age controls on a battery of tests or motor balance. A dual-task paradigm was used.sbd.subjects performed each test twice, once as a single task, and once as a dual task concurrently with a secondary task. Two alternative secondary tasks were used, the classic counting-backwards task and an auditory choice reaction task. Both secondary tasks were calibrated for each subject to ensure that their performance on the secondary task alone fell between pre-specified performance criteria. In all single-task conditions there was no difference between the performance of the two groups. By contrast, in 19 out of the 20 tests performed under dual-task conditions, the dyslexic group were significantly impaired, whereas the controls showed no impairment, thus resulting in significantly better performance by the control group than the dyslexic group. The sole exception was that the dyslexic children were not impaired on the easiest balance condition with the choice reaction task. under the dual-task conditions the dyslexic children also performed worse than the controls on the secondary task. It is very hard to accommodate the findings within the traditional framework of a deficit specific to lexical skills. One plausible explanation of the results is that, unlike the controls, the dyslexic children need to invest significant conscious resources for monitoring balance, and thus their performance is adversely affected by any secondary task which serves to distract attention from the primary task. This need for conscious compensation suggests that for dyslexic children the skill of motor balance is poorly automatized. It is possible, therefore, that many of the reading deficits of dyslexic children are merely symptoms of a more general learning deficit-the failure to fully automatize skills.
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Cognition 封面图
Cognition
IF:
2.8
论文数:
535
被引数:
2.1W

机构

暂无机构信息
引用论文

引用论文

err
IF0
err
err0
PREAI
err
err分享
err收藏
Prognostic Significance of Cerebral Status
err1991-09-01
err0
PREAI
errMARSHALL L. SILVERSTEIN; LOUIS FOGG; MARTIN HARROW
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Picosecond imaging circuit analysis
err2000-07-01
err0
PREAI
errJ. C. Tsang; J. A. Kash; D. P. Vallett
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容