.png){kind=icon}
返回
Can Self-Help Groups Really Be Self-Help?
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1093/restud/rdw004.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
We provide an experimental and theoretical evaluation of a cost-reducing innovation in the delivery of self-help group microfinance services, in which privatized agents earn payments through membership fees for providing services. Under the status quo, agents are paid by an outside donor and offer members free services. In our multi-country randomized control trial, we evaluate the change in this incentive scheme on agent behaviour and performance, and on overall village-level outcomes. We find that privatized agents start groups, attract members, mobilize savings, and intermediate loans at similar levels after a year but at much lower costs to the NGO. At the village level, we find higher levels of borrowing, business-related savings, and investment in business. Examining mechanisms, we find that self-help groups serve more business-oriented clientele when facilitated by agents who face strong financial incentives.
Keyword:
Microfinance
Self-help groups
Privatized delivery
Cost sharing
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
6.4
论文数:
2.5K
被引数:
2.1W
查看更多机构
.png){kind=icon}
