arrow
返回

Comparing different machine learning and mathematical regression models to evaluate multiple sequence alignments

delete2015-09-01
delete13
PRE
AI
F
Francisco Ortuño *
O
Olga Valenzuela
B
Beatriz Prieto
M
María José Sáez‐Lara
C
Carolina Torres
H
H. Pomares
I
Ignacio Rojas
DOI:10.1016/j.neucom.2015.01.080delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
The evaluation of multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) is still an open task in bioinformatics. Current MSA scores do not agree about how alignments must be accurately evaluated. Consequently, it is not trivial to know the quality of MSAs when reference alignments are not provided. Recent scores tend to use more complex evaluations adding supplementary biological features. In this work, a set of novel regression approaches are proposed for the MSA evaluation, comparing several supervised learning and mathematical methodologies. Therefore, the following models specifically designed for regression are applied: regression trees, a bootstrap aggregation of regression trees (bagging trees), least-squares support vector machines (LS-SVMs) and Gaussian processes. These algorithms consider a heterogeneous set of biological features together with other standard MSA scores in order to predict the quality of alignments. The most relevant features are then applied to build novel score schemes for the evaluation of alignments. The proposed algorithms are validated by using the BAliBASE benchmark. Additionally, an statistical ANOVA test is performed to study the relevance of these scores considering three alignment factors. According to the obtained results, the four regression models provide accurate evaluations, even outperforming other standard scores such as BLOSUM, PAM or STRIKE. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Multiple sequence alignments (MSAs)
Alignment quality
Least squares support vector machines (LS-SVM)
Decision trees
Bootstrap aggregation
Gaussian process
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Neurocomputing 封面图
Neurocomputing
IF:
6.5
论文数:
2.5W
被引数:
6.5W

机构

U
University of Granada
学者数:
2.3W
论文数: 1.9W
被引数: 24
引用论文

引用论文

ProbCons: Probabilistic consistency-based multiple sequence alignment
err2005-02-01
err952
errOAAI
errDo, CB; Mahabhashyam, MSP; Brudno, M; Batzoglou, S
err分享
err收藏
Margin distribution based bagging pruning
err2012-05-01
err23
PREAI
errXie, Zongxia; Xu, Yong; Hu, Qinghua; Zhu, Pengfei
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
UniProt: the Universal Protein knowledgebaseUniProt: 通用蛋白质知识库
err2004-01-01
err6.0K
errOAAI
errApweiler, R; Bairoch, A; Wu, CH; Barker, WC; Boeckmann, B; Ferro, S; Gasteiger, E; Huang, HZ; Lopez, R; Magrane, M; Martin, MJ; Natale, DA; O'Donovan, C; Redaschi, N; Yeh, LSL
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容