返回
Conceptual differences between meals
DOI:10.1016/S0950-3293(00)00023-9.png)
摘要
En 中文
This study follows up prior research findings indicating that people employed evaluative and social-emotional criteria in significantly different ways when asked to conceptualize their recent morning, midday and evening meals. A convenience sample (N = 157) of males and females ranging in age from is to 87 rated their most recent and their ideal morning, midday and evening meals on a series of evaluative and social-emotional scales. Analysis of the combined recent and ideal meal ratings showed that regardless of the variable meal contents, morning meals were generally seen as significantly less expensive, more casual: convenient and lighter than other meals, whereas evening meals were seen as more unusual, elderly, masculine and happy than other meals. Comparisons between recent and ideal meals revealed that the latter are seen as significantly better liked, less convenient, happier. heavier, and more unusual than the former. Moreover, older women stood out as rating both their recent and ideal meals as healthier than all other respondents. Additional factor analytic results showed substantial structural differences between the patterns of evaluative and social-emotional ratings applied to recent morning, midday and evening meals. Pending further research with a larger, more representative sample, it is concluded that there are important conceptual and social-emotional differences between morning, midday and evening meals. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
morning meal
midday meal
evening meal
social meaning
ideal meals
evaluation
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
4.9
论文数:
4.4K
被引数:
1.9W
机构
暂无机构信息

