.png){kind=icon}
返回
Crowded minds: The implicit bystander effect
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.843.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Five studies merged the priming methodology with the bystander apathy literature and demonstrate how merely priming a social context at Time 1 leads to less helping behavior on a subsequent, completely unrelated task at Time 2. In Study 1, participants who imagined being with a group at Time 1 pledged significantly fewer dollars on a charity-giving measure at Time 2 than did those who imagined being alone with one other person. Studies 2-5 build converging evidence with hypothetical and real helping behavior measures and demonstrate that participants who imagine the presence of others show facilitation to words associated with unaccountable on a lexical decision task. Implications for social group research and the priming methodology are discussed.
Keyword:
RELATIONAL SCHEMAS
RESPONSIBILITY
ACCESSIBILITY
INFORMATION
DIFFUSION
BEHAVIOR
HELP
INTERVENTION
CONSTRUCT
DECISION
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
6.7
论文数:
7.0K
被引数:
8.2W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS社会心理研究中的主持人中介变量区分-概念，战略和统计考虑
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容