.png){kind=icon}
返回
Democratic transitions
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00201.x.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Przeworski et al. (2000) challenge the key hypothesis in modernization theory: political regimes do not transition to democracy as per capita incomes rise, they argue. Rather, democratic transitions occur randomly, but once there, countries with higher levels of GDP per capita remain democratic. We retest the modernization hypothesis using new data, new techniques, and a three-way rather than dichotomous classification of regimes. Contrary to Przeworski et al. (2000) we find that the modernization hypothesis stands up well. We also find that partial democracies emerge as among the most important and least understood regime types.
Keyword:
ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT
INSTITUTIONS
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
5.6
论文数:
2.7K
被引数:
1.6W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
分享收藏分享收藏
The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation比较发展的殖民起源: 实证研究.png)
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEWIF11.6
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容