.png){kind=icon}
返回
DOES STRATEGY RESEARCH NEED GAME-THEORY
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1002/smj.4250121010.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Game theory has not been applied much to business strategy. I review some criticism of the game-theoretic approach which inhibits its application, and mention some others. The common criticism that game-theoretic models assume too much rationality is often wrong because (i) some games require little rationality to compute equilibria; and (ii) players may reach an equilibrium by communicating, adapting, or evolving to it rather than by calculating it. However, other criticisms can be forceful: Game theory is hard to use and test, it threatens to explain anything, it generates customized models of local settings rather than general regularities, and it offers only part of the advice a manager needs. Nonetheless, game theory could be a fruitful source of ideas and testable implications for strategy, requiring more fine-grained, longitudinal studies sensitive to interactions between structural variables.
Keyword:
GAME THEORY
EQUILIBRIUM
STRATEGY FORMULATION
ECONOMICS
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
7.2
论文数:
3.4K
被引数:
4.6W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
Correction: Stakeholders' views and experiences of care and interventions for addressing frailty and pre-frailty: A meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence.png)
PLOS ONE
OAAI
PLOS ONEIF0
OAAI分享收藏RATIONALIZABILITY, LEARNING, AND EQUILIBRIUM IN GAMES WITH STRATEGIC COMPLEMENTARITIESECONOMETRICA
ECONOMETRICAIF7.1
PREAI
分享收藏Watershed discharge modulates relationships between landscape components and nutrient ratios in stream sestonEcology
EcologyIF0
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容