.png){kind=icon}
返回
Double Conjunction Fallacies in Physicians' Probability Judgment
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1177/0272989X18786358.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
We report the first empirical data showing a significant amount of double conjunction fallacies in physicians' probability judgments concerning prognosis and diagnosis. Our results support the hypothesis that physicians' probability judgments are guided by assessments of evidential impact between diagnostic conditions and clinical signs. Moreover, we show that, contrary to some influential views, double conjunction fallacies represent an experimentally replicable reasoning bias. We discuss how the phenomenon eludes major current accounts of uncertain reasoning in medicine and beyond and how it relates to clinical practice.
Keyword:
clinical reasoning
conjunction fallacy
probability judgment
reasoning bias
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
2.3
论文数:
2.6K
被引数:
6.4K
机构
引用论文
Women in southern Nigeria with change in paternity do not have increased incidence of pre-eclampsia
PREAI
分享收藏The Conjunction Fallacy, Confirmation, and Quantum Theory: Comment on Tentori, Crupi, and Russo (2013)合取谬误，确认和量子理论: 对Tentori，Crupi和Russo的评论 (2013)
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏EXTENSIONAL VERSUS INTUITIVE REASONING - THE CONJUNCTION FALLACY IN PROBABILITY JUDGMENT外延推理与直觉推理 -- 概率判断中的合取谬误.png)
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW
OAAI
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEWIF5.8
OAAI分享收藏Noisy Probability Judgment, the Conjunction Fallacy, and Rationality: Comment on Costello and Watts (2014)PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEWOAAI
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEWIF5.8
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容