.png){kind=icon}
返回
Electoral simultaneity: Expressing equal respect
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00574.x.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
The principle of simultaneity-that citizens should vote as far as possible at the same time-is more significant than is usually appreciated. It is based on a fundamental value of democratic theory, and it has substantial implications for electoral practice. It also invites further normative and empirical research. The most important value that simultaneity expresses is a form of equality-equal respect. First, if citizens have only information they would have had if they were voting at the same time, the value of each citizen's choice is no greater than that of any other citizen. Second, when citizens go to the polls on the same day, publicly participating in a common experience of civic engagement, they demonstrate their willingness to contribute to the democratic process on equal terms. Taking simultaneity seriously has implications for electoral practices. It would limit the practice of media projections of election results, including the reporting of exit polls, and the calling of elections before all the polls close. It also casts doubt on the increasingly widespread use of early voting-absentee ballots and voting by mail. Early voting weakens the value of the experience of participating in a civic activity. Voting alone may be worse than bowling alone.
Keyword:
UNITED-STATES
ELECTION
CONSEQUENCES
BANDWAGON
JUSTICE
TURNOUT
MEDIA
MODEL
LAW
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
4.7
论文数:
2.2K
被引数:
1.0W
机构
引用论文
Density functional theory and topological analysis on the hydrogen bonding interactions in cysteine‐thymine complexes密度泛函理论和对半胱氨酸‐胸腺嘧啶复合物中氢键相互作用拓扑分析
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏
BANDWAGON, UNDERDOG, OR PROJECTION - OPINION POLLS AND ELECTORAL CHOICE IN BRITAIN, 1979-1987.png)
JOURNAL OF POLITICS
JOURNAL OF POLITICSIF3.8
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容