arrow
返回

Errors in after-hours phone consultations: a simulation study

delete2013-12-13
delete2
delete
OA
AI
E
Erel Joffe *
J
James P. Turley
K
Kevin O. Hwang
T
Todd R. Johnson
C
Craig Johnson
E
Elmer V. Bernstam
DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002243delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Background After-hours out-of-hospital phone consultations require physicians to make decisions based on information provided by a nurse over the phone. Methods We conducted a simulation study to evaluate physicians' actions following communication of key information. 22 nurses were asked to call physicians with six cases based on the six most common reasons for after-hours phone calls. We evaluated physicians' actions following the communication of key clinical information: A situation cue described a patient's problem (eg, confusion). A background cue described a specific clinical finding regarding the cause of the problem (eg, patient's sodium is low). For each cue we defined a list of indicators, based on the medical literature, to ascertain whether physicians acted upon the provided information (which was defined as addressing at least one of the indicators). Results A total of 108 phone consultations (containing 88 situation and 93 background cues) were analysed. Situation cues were communicated in 90% (79/88) of the calls and background cues in 33% (31/93). Physician acted upon the provided information in 57% (45/79) and 48% (15/31) of the communicated situation and background cues, respectively. When the background cues were not communicated, physicians asked questions expected to elicit the cue in 12% of the cases. Responding to the situation cue was associated with longer conversations and active inquiry by the physician. Conclusions After-hours phone calls are error prone. Both nurse communication and physician decision-making are problematic. Efforts to improve patient safety in this setting must address both communication and decision-making.
Keyword:
Communication
Diagnostic Errors
Hand-Off
Hospital Medicine
Human Error
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

BMJ Quality and Safety 封面图
BMJ Quality and Safety
IF:
6.5
论文数:
2.3K
被引数:
7.5K

机构

U
university of texas system
学者数:
18.5W
论文数: 15.6W
被引数: 210
T
Tel Aviv University
学者数:
3.7W
论文数: 3.0W
被引数: 3.6W
引用论文

引用论文

Rapid response teams - Walk, don't run
err2006-10-04
err142
PREAI
errWinters, Bradford D.; Pham, Julius; Pronovost, Peter J.
err分享
err收藏
Appropriateness of diagnostic management and outcomes of suspected pulmonary embolism
err2006-02-07
err254
PREAI
errRoy, PM; Meyer, G; Vielle, B; Le Gall, C; Verschuren, F; Carpentier, F; Leveau, P; Furber, A
err分享
err收藏
Inner Ear Hair Cell-Like Cells from Human Embryonic Stem Cells
err2014-06-01
err0
errOAAI
errMohammad Ronaghi; Marjan Nasr; Megan Ealy; Robert Durruthy-Durruthy; Joerg Waldhaus; Giovanni H. Diaz; Lydia-Marie Joubert; Kazuo Oshima; Stefan Heller
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
After-Hours Care and its Coordination with Primary Care in the U.S.
err2012-06-01
err40
errOAAI
errO'Malley, Ann S.; Samuel, Divya; Bond, Amelia M.; Carrier, Emily
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容