arrow
返回

Evaluating Student Knowledge Assessment Using Machine Learning Techniques

delete2023-04-04
delete2
delete
OA
AI
N
Nuha Alruwais
M
Mohammed Zakariah *
DOI:10.3390/su15076229delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
The process of learning about a student's knowledge and comprehension of a particular subject is referred to as student knowledge assessment. It helps to identify areas where students need additional support or challenge and can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of instruction, make important decisions such as on student placement and curriculum development, and monitor the quality of education. Evaluating student knowledge assessment is essential to measuring student progress, informing instruction, and providing feedback to improve student performance and enhance the overall teaching and learning experience. This research paper is designed to create a machine learning (ML)-based system that assesses student performance and knowledge throughout the course of their studies and pinpoints the key variables that have the most significant effects on that performance and expertise. Additionally, it describes the impact of running models with data that only contains key features on their performance. To classify the students, the paper employs seven different classifiers, including support vector machines (SVM), logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), gradient boosting machine (GBM), Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), and multi-layer perceptron (MLP). This paper carries out two experiments to see how best to replicate the automatic classification of student knowledge. In the first experiment, the dataset (Dataset 1) was used in its original state, including all five properties listed in the dataset, to evaluate the performance indicators. In the second experiment, the least correlated variable was removed from the dataset to create a smaller dataset (Dataset 2), and the same set of performance indicators was evaluated. Then, the performance indicators using Dataset 1 and Dataset 2 were compared. The GBM exhibited the highest prediction accuracy of 98%, according to Dataset 1. In terms of prediction error, the GBM also performed well. The accuracy of optimistic forecasts on student performance, denoted as the performance indicator 'precision', was highest in GBM at 99%, while DT, RF, and SVM were 98% accurate in their optimistic forecasts for Dataset 1. The second experiment's findings demonstrated that practically no classifiers showed appreciable improvements in prediction accuracy with a reduced feature set in Dataset 2. It showed that the time required for related learning objects and the knowledge level corresponding to a goal learning object have less impact.
Keyword:
student knowledge assessment
machine learning
gradient boosting machine
logistic regression
predictive features
performance prediction

期刊

Sustainability 封面图
Sustainability
IF:
3.3
论文数:
10.6W
被引数:
28.4W

机构

K
King Saud University
学者数:
3.4W
论文数: 3.8W
被引数: 815
引用论文

引用论文

Spam message detection using Danger theory and Krill herd optimization
err2021-11-01
err0
PREAI
errAakanksha Sharaff; Chandramani Kamal; Siddhartha Porwal; Surbhi Bhatia; Kuljeet Kaur; Mohammad Mehendi Hassan
err分享
err收藏
err
IF0
err
err0
PREAI
err
err分享
err收藏
The impact of class imbalance in classification performance metrics based on the binary confusion matrix
err2019-07-01
err590
errOAAI
errLuque, Amalia; Carrasco, Alejandro; Martin, Alejandro; de las Heras, Ana
err分享
err收藏
In-Vivo Imaging of Changes in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Thrombus Volume During the Cardiac Cycle
err2009-06-01
err0
errOAAI
errMaarten Truijers; Mark F. Fillinger; Klaas Jan W. Renema; Steven P. Marra; Luuk J. Oostveen; Harrie A. J. M. Kurvers; Leo J. SchultzeKool; Jan D. Blankensteijn
err分享
err收藏
Human and Other Mammalian Bite Injuries of the Hand
err2015-01-01
err0
errOAAI
errStephen A. Kennedy; Laura E. Stoll; Alexander S. Lauder
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容