arrow
返回

Experimental Design and Primary Data Analysis Methods for Comparing Adaptive Interventions

delete2012-12-01
delete216
delete
OA
AI
I
Inbal Nahum‐Shani *
M
Min Qian
D
Daniel Almirall
W
William E. Pelham
G
Gregory A. Fabiano
J
James G. Waxmonsky
J
Jihnhee Yu
S
Susan A. Murphy
DOI:10.1037/a0029372delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
In recent years, research in the area of intervention development has been shifting from the traditional fixed-intervention approach to adaptive interventions, which allow greater individualization and adaptation of intervention options (i.e., intervention type and/or dosage) over time. Adaptive interventions are operationalized via a sequence of decision rules that specify how intervention options should be adapted to an individual's characteristics and changing needs, with the general aim to optimize the long-term effectiveness of the intervention. Here, we review adaptive interventions, discussing the potential contribution of this concept to research in the behavioral and social sciences. We then propose the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART), an experimental design useful for addressing research questions that inform the construction of high-quality adaptive interventions. To clarify the SMART approach and its advantages, we compare SMART with other experimental approaches. We also provide methods for analyzing data from SMART to address primary research questions that inform the construction of a high-quality adaptive intervention.
Keyword:
adaptive interventions
experimental design
sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART)

期刊

Psychological Methods 封面图
Psychological Methods
IF:
7.8
论文数:
1.3K
被引数:
2.1W

机构

C
Columbia University
学者数:
7.1W
论文数: 6.4W
被引数: 263
State University System of Florida 封面图
State University System of Florida
学者数:
12.8W
论文数: 10.9W
被引数: 130
F
Florida International University
学者数:
7.4K
论文数: 5.9K
被引数: 1.1W
U
University of Michigan
学者数:
6.4W
论文数: 5.3W
被引数: 124
U
university of michigan system
学者数:
9.1W
论文数: 8.6W
被引数: 133
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

暂无论文信息