.png){kind=icon}
返回
Field experiments in strategy research
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1002/smj.2449.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Strategy research often aims to empirically establish a causal relationship between an independent variable and a dependent variable such as firm performance. For many important strategy research questions, however, traditional empirical techniques are not sufficient to establish causal effects with high confidence. We propose that field experiments have potential to be used more widely in strategy research, leveraging methodological innovations from other disciplines to address persistent puzzles in the literature. We first review the advantages and disadvantages of using field experiments to answer questions in strategy. We define two types of experiments, strategy field experiments and process field experiments, and present an original example of each variety. The first study explores the liability of foreignness and the second study tests theories regarding corporate culture. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keyword:
field experiments
research methods
culture
liability of foreignness
foreign direct investment
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
7.2
论文数:
3.4K
被引数:
4.6W
机构
引用论文
Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games: Comment.png)
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEWIF11.6
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容