arrow
返回

Fuzzy Delphi method for evaluating hydrogen production technologies

delete2011-10-01
delete124
PRE
AI
P
Pao‐Long Chang
C
Chiung–Wen Hsu *
P
Po‐Chien Chang
DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.045delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
The purpose of this research is to establish an evaluation model for selecting the most appropriate technology for development in Taiwan, based on 14 evaluation criteria. Due to the inherent uncertainty and imprecision associated with the mapping of decision makers' perception to crisp values, linguistic variables are used to assess the weights of the criteria and the ratings of each technology with respect to each criterion. The criteria weights and technology ratings are collected through a seven-point linguistic scale using a Delphi questionnaire. The linguistic scores are then converted into fuzzy numbers, and a consensus of the decision makers' opinions on weights and ratings is mathematically derived using fuzzy Delphi methodology. We have used the model to evaluate seven different hydrogen production technologies. The results indicate that hydrogen production via electrolysis by wind power and that via electrolysis by photovoltaic electricity are the two technologies that should be chosen for further development. Copyright (C) 2011, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Hydrogen production
Biohydrogen
Fuzzy Delphi method
Assessment model
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 封面图
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
IF:
8.3
论文数:
5.5W
被引数:
23.1W

机构

F
Feng Chia University
学者数:
3.5K
论文数: 3.7K
被引数: 2.6K
引用论文

引用论文

Energy system assessment with sustainability indicators
err2000-07-01
err187
PREAI
errAfgan, NH; Carvalho, MG; Hovanov, NV
err分享
err收藏
Multi-criteria evaluation of hydrogen system options
err2007-10-01
err79
PREAI
errAfgan, Naim H.; Veziroglu, Ayfer; Carvalho, Maria G.
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容