.png){kind=icon}
返回
Guidance and Considerations When Performing Data-Validity Checks
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1111/cdev.14221.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
This response to a Commentary by Delgado-Ron, Jeyabalan, Watt, and Salway (2024) on Cimpian, Timmer, and Kim's (2023) paper discusses and clarifies some key issues in applying the new data-validity sensitivity analysis proposed by Cimpian et al. (2023). The differences in the applications of the method by Delgado-Ron et al. (2024) and Cimpian et al. (2023) present an opportunity to recognize the possibilities of this method, while also noting some challenges and limitations. This response-commentary focuses on five key areas: (1) surmising a set of likely motivations of the survey respondents, (2) selecting the screener items, (3) considering the outcomes examined, (4) reflecting on null results in a sensitivity analysis, and (5) recognizing the advantages and disadvantages of the ease of this new method.
Keyword:
MISCHIEVOUS RESPONDERS
BIAS
期刊
IF:
3.8
论文数:
6.0K
被引数:
3.2W
机构
引用论文
分享收藏Mitigating invalid data bias in the estimation of sexual orientation disparities in a survey of youth in US and Canada.png)
CHILD DEVELOPMENT
OAAI
CHILD DEVELOPMENTIF3.8
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容