arrow
返回

Highly cited retracted papers

delete2017-01-03
delete29
PRE
AI
J
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva *
J
Judit Dobránszki
DOI:10.1007/s11192-016-2227-4delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
We examine the number of citations in 10 highly cited retracted papers, and compare their current pre- and post-citation values. We offer some possible explanations for the continued citation of these retracted papers, and point out some of the risks that may be involved for the communities that continue to cite them. In general, retracted papers should not be cited, but often there is fault with unclear publisher web-sites, the existence of pirate web-sites or sites that display copies of the unretracted version of the paper, or even the insistent citation of a retracted paper because the results remain valid, or because the authors (most likely) refuse to accept the retracted status of that paper, or continue to believe that the core findings of the study remain valid.
Keyword:
Citations
Fraud
Misconduct
PubMed
Reference validation
Retraction
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Scientometrics 封面图
Scientometrics
IF:
3.5
论文数:
8.1K
被引数:
2.2W

机构

U
University of Debrecen
学者数:
1.0W
论文数: 7.0K
被引数: 6.3K
引用论文

引用论文

Wetting of Solids
err2018-03-14
err0
PREAI
errMartin E. R. Shanahan; Wulff Possart
err分享
err收藏
Why do some retracted papers continue to be cited?
err2016-11-11
err69
PREAI
errTeixeira da Silva, Jaime A.; Bornemann-Cimenti, Helmar
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容