返回
How Does Technological Regime Affect Performance of Technology Development Projects?
DOI:10.1111/jpim.12192.png)
摘要
En 中文
In this study, we examine how technological regime affects the performance of technology development projects (i.e., project quality, sales, and profit). Technological regime is defined as the set of attributes of a technological environment where the innovative activities of firms take place. Technological opportunity, appropriability of innovations, cumulativeness of knowledge and capabilities, and closeness of knowledge base to basic sciences (versus applied sciences) are attributes of technological regime. Using data from 381 firms across five industries, we show that high levels of technological opportunity, appropriability, and closeness of knowledge base to basic sciences are associated with higher project performance. Cumulativeness is associated with higher project quality, but not higher sales and profit. We also show that the effect of technological opportunity on project performance is moderated by two other determinants of technological regime: cumulativeness and nature of knowledge base. We find that cumulativeness has a negative moderating effect on the positive relationship between technological opportunity and project performance, while closeness of knowledge base to basic sciences positively moderates the effect of technological opportunity on project performance. We discuss the implications of our findings for new product development research and practice.
Keyword:
RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE
SECTORAL PATTERNS
INNOVATION
KNOWLEDGE
SPILLOVERS
INERTIA
IMPACT
FIRMS
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
8
论文数:
2.0K
被引数:
9.3K
机构
引用论文
Enhanced anti-poisoning performance against carbon monoxide of LaNi4.7Al0.3 alloy encapsulated in polymethyl methacrylate聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯包裹的LaNi4.7Al0.3合金对一氧化碳的增强抗中毒性能
Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies行为研究中常见的方法偏差: 对文献的批判性回顾和建议的补救措施

