.png){kind=icon}
返回
How to overcome algorithm aversion: Learning from mistakes
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1002/jcpy.1313.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
When consumers avoid taking algorithmic advice, it can prove costly to both marketers (whose algorithmic product offerings go unused) and to themselves (who fail to reap the benefits that algorithmic predictions often provide). In a departure from previous research focusing on when algorithm aversion proves more or less likely, we sought to identify and remedy one reason why it occurs in the first place. In seven pre-registered studies, we find that consumers tend to avoid algorithmic advice on the often faulty assumption that those algorithms, unlike their human counterparts, cannot learn from mistakes, in turn offering an inroad by which to reduce algorithm aversion: highlighting their ability to learn. Process evidence, through both mediation and moderation, examines why consumers fail to trust algorithms that err across a variety of prediction domains and how different theory-driven interventions can solve the practical problem of enhancing trust and consequential choice in algorithms.
Keyword:
learning from mistakes
algorithm appreciation
algorithm aversion
intervention
mistakes
期刊
IF:
6.1
论文数:
1.3K
被引数:
8.5K
机构
引用论文
CASE OF BEVACIZUMAB-INDUCED MICROANGIOPATHY MASQUERADING AS AN IMMUNE COMPLEX DISORDER贝伐珠单抗诱导的微血管病伪装成免疫复合物疾病病例
PREAI
分享收藏Coronary artery disease in patients dying from cardiogenic shock or congestive heart failure in the setting of acute myocardial infarction..png)
Heart
OAAI
HeartIF0
OAAI分享收藏Mistaking Minds and Machines: How Speech Affects Dehumanization and Anthropomorphism错误的思想和机器: 言语如何影响非人化和拟人化OAAI
OAAI分享收藏Inhibition of In Vitro Angiogenesis by Platelet Factor-4–Derived Peptides and Mechanism of ActionBlood
BloodIF0
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容