.png){kind=icon}
返回
Judging Truth
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050807.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Deceptive claims surround us, embedded in fake news, advertisements, political propaganda, and rumors. How do people know what to believe? Truth judgments reflect inferences drawn from three types of information: base rates, feelings, and consistency with information retrieved from memory. First, people exhibit a bias to accept incoming information, because most claims in our environments are true. Second, people interpret feelings, like ease of processing, as evidence of truth. And third, people can (but do not always) consider whether assertions match facts and source information stored in memory. This three-part framework predicts specific illusions (e.g., truthiness, illusory truth), offers ways to correct stubborn misconceptions, and suggests the importance of converging cues in a post-truth world, where falsehoods travel further and faster than the truth.
Keyword:
inference
truth bias
illusory truth
fluency
knowledge
source
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
29.4
论文数:
1.9K
被引数:
3.0W
机构
引用论文
NetCmpt: a network-based tool for calculating the metabolic competition between bacterial speciesOAAI
.png){kind=icon}
OAAI分享收藏Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing错误信息及其纠正: 持续的影响和成功的去偏性OAAI
OAAI分享收藏
分享收藏
查看更多内容