.png){kind=icon}
返回
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
摘要
En 中文
Inclusive design prescribes addressing the needs of the widest possible audience in order to consider human differences. Taking differences seriously, however, may imply severely restricting the widest possible audience. In confronting this paradox, we investigate to what extent Rawls' theory of justice as fairness applies to design. By converting the paradox into the question of how design can be fair, we show that the demand for equitability shifts from the design output to the design process. We conclude that the two main questions about justice find application in design: the question about the standards of justice and the question about its metrics. We endorse a Rawlsian approach to the former, while some revision may be due regarding the latter. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
decision making
design theory
epistemology
user participation
universal design
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
4.8
论文数:
764
被引数:
3.5K
机构
引用论文
Synthesis of silver nanoparticles by Bacillus stearothermophilus using gamma radiation and their antimicrobial activity.使用γ射线合成嗜热脂肪芽孢杆菌（Bacillus stearothermophilus）银纳米粒子及其抗菌活性。.png)
.png)
IF0
PREAI
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容