.png){kind=icon}
返回
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
摘要
En 中文
In this paper, I examine the case made by Christopher McMahon for managerial democracy. Specifically, I examine the extent to which McMahon's account is able to address a series of objections against the case for managerial democracy as articulated by Thomas Christiano. Christiano articulates two sets of objections. First, Christiano argues that McMahon does not succeed in ruling out the possibility that managerial authority is best understood as promissory in its basis, in which case there is no presumption in favor of its democratic exercise. Second, Christiano raises a series of objections to the effect that even if we accept McMahon's account of the nature of managerial authority, the conclusion for the democratic exercise of that authority by workers at the level of individual economic enterprises does not follow. In the end, I argue that McMahon's account contains the resources to address these objections if one adopts a specific view about the moral limits to relationships that involve the submission of the will on the part of one person to another. Adoption of this view, however, appears to come at the expense of what I take to be the account's commitment to liberalism. As such, what I understand this paper to reflect more generally is the apparent difficulty for liberals in arguing that there is something inherently morally troubling about capitalist work relations.
Keyword:
McMahon
managerial democracy
liberalism
Christiano
authority
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
6.7
论文数:
1.0W
被引数:
5.6W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
Analysis of Parallel Sorting Algorithms in K-best Sphere-Decoder Architectures for MIMO Systems.png)
PREAI
分享收藏 没有更多内容
没有更多内容