arrow
返回

Markets versus governments

delete2008-01-01
delete40
delete
OA
AI
A
Acemoglu, D
G
Golosov, Mikhail
T
Tsyvinski, Aleh *
DOI:10.1016/j.jmoneco.2007.12.003delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
We provide a simple framework for comparing market allocations with government-regulated allocations. Governments can collect information about individuals' types and enforce transfers across individuals. Markets (without significant government intervention) have to rely on transactions that are ex post beneficial for individuals. Consequently, governments achieve better risk sharing and consumption smoothing than markets. However, politicians in charge of collective decisions can use the centralized information and the enforcement power of government for their own benefits. This leads to political economy distortions and rents for politicians, making government-operated allocation mechanisms potentially worse than markets. We provide conditions under which it is ex ante beneficial for the society to tolerate the political economy distortions in exchange for the improvement in risk sharing. For example, more effective controls on politicians or higher discount factors of politicians make governments more attractive relative to markets. Moreover, when markets cannot engage in self-enforcing risk-sharing arrangements and income effects are limited, greater risk aversion and greater uncertainty make governments more attractive relative to markets. Nevertheless, we also show theoretically and numerically that the effect of risk aversion on the desirability of markets may be non-monotonic. In particular, when markets can support self-enforcing risk-sharing arrangements, a high degree of risk aversion improves the extent of risk sharing in markets and makes governments less necessary. The same pattern may also arise because of income effects on labor supply. Consequently, the welfare gains of governments relative to markets may have an inverse U-shape as a function of the degree of risk aversion of individuals. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
governments
markets
mechanisms
political economy
risk sharing
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Journal of Monetary Economics 封面图
Journal of Monetary Economics
IF:
4.1
论文数:
3.2K
被引数:
1.1W

机构

H
Harvard University
学者数:
26.5W
论文数: 22.0W
被引数: 28.7W
引用论文

引用论文

err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
CircRNA-Based Cervical Cancer Prognosis Model, Immunological Validation and Drug Prediction基于circRNA的宫颈癌预后模型、免疫学验证和药物预测
err2022-10-25
err0
errOAAI
errXu Guo; Sui Chen; Sihan Wang; Hao Zhang; Fanxing Yin; Panpan Guo; Xiaoxu Zhang; Xuesong Liu; Yanshuo Han
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容