返回
Markets versus governments
DOI:10.1016/j.jmoneco.2007.12.003.png)
摘要
En 中文
We provide a simple framework for comparing market allocations with government-regulated allocations. Governments can collect information about individuals' types and enforce transfers across individuals. Markets (without significant government intervention) have to rely on transactions that are ex post beneficial for individuals. Consequently, governments achieve better risk sharing and consumption smoothing than markets. However, politicians in charge of collective decisions can use the centralized information and the enforcement power of government for their own benefits. This leads to political economy distortions and rents for politicians, making government-operated allocation mechanisms potentially worse than markets. We provide conditions under which it is ex ante beneficial for the society to tolerate the political economy distortions in exchange for the improvement in risk sharing. For example, more effective controls on politicians or higher discount factors of politicians make governments more attractive relative to markets. Moreover, when markets cannot engage in self-enforcing risk-sharing arrangements and income effects are limited, greater risk aversion and greater uncertainty make governments more attractive relative to markets. Nevertheless, we also show theoretically and numerically that the effect of risk aversion on the desirability of markets may be non-monotonic. In particular, when markets can support self-enforcing risk-sharing arrangements, a high degree of risk aversion improves the extent of risk sharing in markets and makes governments less necessary. The same pattern may also arise because of income effects on labor supply. Consequently, the welfare gains of governments relative to markets may have an inverse U-shape as a function of the degree of risk aversion of individuals. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
governments
markets
mechanisms
political economy
risk sharing
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
4.1
论文数:
3.2K
被引数:
1.1W
机构
引用论文
Contracting with imperfect commitment and the revelation principle: The single agent case
ECONOMETRICA
IF7.1
DAP12 deletion causes age-related motor function impairment but promotes functional recovery after sciatic nerve crush injuryDAP12基因敲除导致年龄相关性运动功能障碍,但促进坐骨神经挤压损伤后的功能恢复
CircRNA-Based Cervical Cancer Prognosis Model, Immunological Validation and Drug Prediction基于circRNA的宫颈癌预后模型、免疫学验证和药物预测

