arrow
返回

Measurement Development and Evaluation

delete2020-01-21
delete41
delete
OA
AI
M
Michael J. Zickar *
DOI:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-044957delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Psychological measurement is at the heart of organizational research. I review recent practices in the area of measurement development and evaluation, detailing best practice recommendations in both of these areas. Throughout the article, I stress that theory and discovery should guide scale development and that statistical tools, although they play a crucial role, should be chosen to best evaluate the theoretical underpinnings of scales as well as to best promote discovery. I review all stages of scale development and evaluation, ranging from construct specification and item writing, to scale revision. Different statistical frameworks are considered, including classical test theory, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and item response theory, and I encourage readers to consider how best to use each of these tools to capitalize on each approach's particular strengths.
Keyword:
psychological measurement
scale development
factor analysis
item response theory
psychometrics
test theory
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 封面图
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
IF:
31.1
论文数:
470
被引数:
6.4K

机构

U
University System of Ohio
学者数:
15.5W
论文数: 13.0W
被引数: 200
引用论文

引用论文

err2000-01-01
err0
PREAI
errSteven S. Coughlin
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Direct white light photoluminescent nanoparticles with one fluorophore
err2009-05-19
err0
PREAI
errYing-Ling Liu; Yen-Hsing Wu; Chih-Yuan Hsu
err分享
err收藏
Embedded Online Questionnaire Measures Are Sensitive to Identifying Mild Cognitive Impairment
err2016-04-01
err0
errOAAI
errAdriana Seelye; Nora Mattek; Diane B. Howieson; Daniel Austin; Katherine Wild; Hiroko H. Dodge; Jeffrey A. Kaye
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容