.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Merging conformational landscapes in a single consensus space with FlexConsensus algorithm
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1038/s41592-025-02841-w.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Structural heterogeneity analysis in cryogenic electron microscopy is experiencing a breakthrough in estimating more accurate, richer and interpretable conformational landscapes derived from experimental data. The emergence of new methods designed to tackle the heterogeneity challenge reflects this new paradigm, enabling users to gain a better understanding of protein dynamics. However, the question of how intrinsically different heterogeneity algorithms compare remains unsolved, which is crucial for determining the reliability, stability and correctness of the estimated conformational landscapes. Here, to overcome the previous challenge, we introduce FlexConsenus: a multi-autoencoder neural network able to learn the commonalities and differences among several conformational landscapes, enabling them to be placed in a shared consensus space with enhanced reliability. The consensus space enables the measurement of reproducibility in heterogeneity estimations, allowing users to either focus their analysis on particles with a stable estimation of their structural variability or concentrate on specific particle subsets detected by only certain methods. FlexConsensus is a multi-autoencoder-based algorithm for merging different conformational landscapes from cryogenic electron microscopy heterogeneity analysis into a common latent space for the identification of similarities and differences among various methods. This helps in the validation of estimated conformational landscape and provides tools to streamline the heterogeneity workflow.
Keywords:
cryogenic electron microscopy
structural heterogeneity
conformational landscapes
multi-autoencoder
consensus space
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
32.1
Papers:
7.2K
Citations:
12.7W