.png){kind=icon}
返回
Methods for capturing and analyzing adaptations: implications for implementation research
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1186/s13012-022-01218-3.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Background: Interventions are often adapted; some adaptations may provoke more favorable outcomes, whereas some may not. A better understanding of the adaptations and their intended goals may elucidate which adaptations produce better outcomes. Improved methods are needed to better capture and characterize the impact of intervention adaptations. Methods: We used multiple data collection and analytic methods to characterize adaptations made by practices participating in a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study of a complex, multicomponent diabetes intervention. Data collection methods to identify adaptations included interviews, observations, and facilitator sessions resulting in transcripts, templated notes, and field notes. Adaptations gleaned from these sources were reduced and combined; then, their components were cataloged according to the framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions (FRAME). Analytic methods to characterize adaptations included a co-occurrence table, statistically based k-means clustering, and a taxonomic analysis. Results: We found that (1) different data collection methods elicited more overall adaptations, (2) multiple data collection methods provided understanding of the components of and reasons for adaptation, and (3) analytic methods revealed ways that adaptation components cluster together in unique patterns producing adaptation types. These types may be useful for understanding how the who, what, how, and why of adaptations may fit together and for analyzing with outcome data to determine if the adaptations produce more favorable outcomes rather than by adaptation components individually. Conclusion: Adaptations were prevalent and discoverable through different methods. Enhancing methods to describe adaptations may better illuminate what works in providing improved intervention fit within context.
Keyword:
Implementation fidelity
Adaptation
Shared medical appointments
Qualitative methods
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
13.4
论文数:
2.2K
被引数:
2.0W
机构
引用论文
Towards a comprehensive model for understanding adaptations' impact: the model for adaptation design and impact (MADI).png)
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCEOAAI
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCEIF13.4
OAAI分享收藏Understanding adaptations in the Veteran Health Administration's Transitions Nurse Program: refining methodology and pragmatic implications for scale-upIMPLEMENTATION SCIENCEOAAI
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCEIF13.4
OAAI分享收藏Relationships between clinician-level attributes and fidelity-consistent and fidelity-inconsistent modifications to an evidence-based psychotherapyIMPLEMENTATION SCIENCEOAAI
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCEIF13.4
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction实施研究中的定性方法: 导论PSYCHIATRY RESEARCHOAAI
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCHIF3.9
OAAI分享收藏Systematic, Multimethod Assessment of Adaptations Across Four Diverse Health Systems InterventionsOAAI
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容