.png){kind=icon}
返回
ON EXAMINEE CHOICE IN EDUCATIONAL TESTING
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.3102/00346543064001159.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Throughout our society, individuals are compared on summaries of diverse measures. Often the measures are neither the same for all competitors nor selected randomly from a universe of measures. In fact, comparisons often are based on a mixture of measures in which the competitors choose some or all of the elements of the mixture; applicants to colleges choose some of the courses they take in high school, which extracurricular activities they participate in, and (to some extent) which entrance exams they take. What are the consequences of any selection procedure, if such choices are allowed? How can the adverse consequences be minimized? This article summarizes results from tests that have allowed examinee choice heretofore and provides a basis for a fuller discussion of these issues.
Keyword:
ABILITY
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
10.6
论文数:
1.6K
被引数:
7.4K
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
Texture-structure-based liquid metal filling for blind-end microchannels and its application on multi-layer chips.png)
RSC Advances
OAAI
RSC AdvancesIF0
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容