.png){kind=icon}
返回
On “intent” in research misconduct
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1080/08989621.2024.2374577.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Research misconduct, broadly defined as acts of fabrication, falsification and/or plagiarism, violate the value system of science, cost significant wastage of public resources, and in more extreme cases endanger research participants or members of the society at large. Determination of culpability in research misconduct requires establishment of intent on the part of the respondent or perpetrator. However, “intent” is a state of mind, and its perception is subjective, unequivocal evidence for which would not be as readily established compared to the objective evidence available for the acts themselves. Here, we explore the concept of “intent” in research misconduct, how it is framed in criminological/legal terms, and narrated from a psychological perspective. Based on these, we propose a framework whereby lines of questioning and investigation, as defined by legislative terms and informed by the models and tools of psychology, could help in establishing a preponderance of evidence for culpable intent. Such a framework could be useful in research misconduct adjudications and in delivering sanctions.
Keyword:
Culpable intent
intent
research misconduct
research ethics
期刊
A
IF:
0
论文数:
108
被引数:
1
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏
分享收藏
查看更多内容