arrow
返回

On language 'utility': processing complexity and communicative efficiency

delete2010-11-18
delete113
PRE
AI
T
T. Florian Jaeger *
H
Harry Tily
DOI:10.1002/wcs.126delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Functionalist typologists have long argued that pressures associated with language usage influence the distribution of grammatical properties across the world's languages. Specifically, grammatical properties may be observed more often across languages because they improve a language's utility or decrease its complexity. While this approach to the study of typology offers the potential of explaining grammatical patterns in terms of general principles rather than domain-specific constraints, the notions of utility and complexity are more often grounded in intuition than empirical findings. A suitable empirical foundation might be found in the terms of processing preferences: in that case, psycholinguistic measures of complexity are then expected correlate with typological patterns. We summarize half a century of psycholinguistic work on 'processing complexity' in an attempt to make this work accessible to a broader audience: What makes something hard to process for comprehenders, and what determines speakers' preferences in production? We also briefly discuss recently emerging approaches that link preferences in production to communicative efficiency. These approaches can be seen as providing well-defined measures of utility. With these psycholinguistic findings in mind, it is possible to investigate the extent to which language usage is reflected in typological patterns. We close with a summary of paradigms that allow the link between language usage and typology to be studied empirically. (C) 2010 JohnWiley & Sons, Ltd. WIREs Cogn Sci 2011 2 323-335 DOI: 10.1002/wcs.126
Keyword:
WORKING-MEMORY
FREQUENCY-DISTRIBUTIONS
INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES
EYE-TRACKING
ZIPFS LAW
COMPREHENSION
INTERFERENCE
PROBABILITIES
REDUNDANCY
EVOLUTION
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

W
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews and Cognitive Science
IF:
3.8
论文数:
613
被引数:
2.8K

机构

S
Stanford University
学者数:
9.6W
论文数: 8.2W
被引数: 17.0W
U
University of Rochester
学者数:
2.6W
论文数: 2.1W
被引数: 2.2W
引用论文

引用论文

err分享
err收藏
Nalmefene and its use in alcohol dependence
err2014-01-01
err0
PREAI
errGual, A.; Bruguera, P.; Lopez-Pelayo, H.
err分享
err收藏
A review on 2D-ZnO nanostructure based biosensors: from materials to devices基于2D-ZnO纳米结构的生物传感器: 从材料到器件
err2023-01-01
err0
errOAAI
errM. Sankush Krishna; Sangeeta Singh; Maria Batool; Heba Mohamed Fahmy; Kondaiah Seku; Ahmed Esmail Shalan; Senentxu Lanceros-Mendez; Muhammad Nadeem Zafar
err分享
err收藏
Treatment and Prognosis of AIDS-Related Lymphoma in the Era of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy: Findings from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study
err2007-08-01
err0
errOAAI
errMathew Simcock; Monika Blasko; Urs Karrer; Barbara Bertisch; Miklos Pless; Liisa Blumer; Samir Vora; James Owen Robinson; Enos Bernasconi; Benedetta Terziroli; Sophie Moirandat-Rytz; Hansjakob Furrer; Bernard Hirschel; Pietro Vernazza; Pedram Sendi; Martin Rickenbach; Heiner C Bucher; Manuel Battegay; Michael T Koller; M Battegay; E Bernasconi; J Böni; H Bucher; Ph Bürgisser; S Cattacin; M Cavassini; R Dubs; M Egger; L Elzi; P Erb; M Fischer; M Flepp; A Fontana; P Francioli; H Furrer; M Gorgievski; H Günthard; H Hirsch; B Hirschel; I H Hösli; Ch Kahlert; L Kaiser; U Karrer; C Kind; Th Klimkait; B Ledergerber; G Martinetti; B Martinez; N M uUller; D Nadal; M Opravil; F Paccaud; G Pantaleo; M Rickenbach; C Rudin; P Schmid; D Schultze; J Schüpbach; R Speck; P Taffé; P Tarr; A Telenti; A Trkola; P Vernazza; R Weber; S Yerly
err分享
err收藏
Pembrolizumab (pembro) plus enzalutamide (enza) in abiraterone (abi)-pretreated patients (pts) with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Cohort C of the phase 1b/2 KEYNOTE-365 study.
err2019-05-20
err0
PREAI
errPeter C.C. Fong; Margitta Retz; Alexandra Drakaki; Christophe Massard; William R. Berry; Emanuela Romano; Johann S. De Bono; Susan Feyerabend; Leonard Joseph Appleman; Henry Jacob Conter; Srikala S. Sridhar; Neal D. Shore; Mark David Linch; Anthony M. Joshua; Howard Gurney; Helen Wu; Charles Schloss; Christian Heinrich Poehlein; Evan Y. Yu
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容