arrow
返回

Ordinal judgments in multiattribute decision analysis

delete2002-03-01
delete57
PRE
AI
H
Helen M. Moshkovich
M
Mechitov, AI
D
David L. Olson *
DOI:10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00106-0delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
The article discusses the contradiction between the ambiguity of human judgment in a multicriterion environment and the exactness of the assessments required in the majority of the decision-making methods. Preferential information from the decision makers in the ordinal form (e.g., more preferable, less preferable, etc.) is argued to be more stable and more reliable than cardinal input. Ways of obtaining and using ordinal judgments for rank ordering of multiattribute alternatives are discussed. The effectiveness of the step-wise procedure of using ordinal tradeoffs for comparison of alternatives is evaluated, We introduce the notion of ordinal tradeoffs, presentation of ordinal tradeoffs as a flexible three-stage process, a paired joint ordinal scale (PJOS), and evaluation of the effectiveness of the three-stage process. Simulation results examine the sensitivity of the number of pairwise comparisons required for given numbers of criteria and categories within criteria, as well as the number of alternatives analyzed. This simulation shows that ordinal pairwise comparisons provide sufficient power to discriminate between 75% and 80% of the alternatives compared. While the proportional number of pairwise comparisons relative to the maximum possible decreases with the number of criteria and categories, the method is relatively insensitive to the number of alternatives considered. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
multiattribute decision making
preference elicitation
selection decisions
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

European Journal of Operational Research 封面图
European Journal of Operational Research
IF:
6
论文数:
2.2W
被引数:
6.4W

机构

暂无机构信息
引用论文

引用论文

Artificial intelligence may offer insight into factors determining individual TSH level
err2020-05-20
err0
errOAAI
errPrasanna Santhanam; Tanmay Nath; Faiz Khan Mohammad; Rexford S. Ahima
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
CONTINGENT WEIGHTING IN JUDGMENT AND CHOICE
err1988-07-01
err1.2K
PREAI
errTVERSKY, A; SATTATH, S; SLOVIC, P
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容