返回
Planning for Dissent
DOI:10.1080/01944363.2021.1920845.png)
摘要
En 中文
Participatory planning traditionally requires face-to-face meetings with the public in community fora, design charrettes, planning commission meetings, and so on. However, because of the COVID-19 pandemic and aided by online participatory technologies, planners have been translating their face-to-face practices for use in digital forums. These new tools are equipping planners with greater ability to control meeting interactions, including the ability to stifle dissent. In this Viewpoint, we argue that planners should devise the means to protect modes of digital dissent if they want to avoid propagating the injustices of physical participatory processes in the digital world. Based on ongoing research, we offer guidance to planners about how to begin discussing the meaningful roles dissent could play and how it might effectively and fairly be incorporated into virtual participatory planning processes. In practice, this means that planners must pay more explicit attention to the norms and rules of participation as they evolve for online settings and to avoid hasty judgments when confronted with dissenting voices.
Keyword:
COVID-19
dissent
information and communication technologies
online participatory technologies
participatory planning
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.4
论文数:
2.4K
被引数:
5.5K
机构
引用论文
Hot adaptation: what conflict can contribute to collaborative natural resource management热适应: 冲突可以促进协作自然资源管理
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
IF3.2
Molecular epidemiology of an outbreak of infection with hepatitis C virus in recipients of anti-D immunoglobulin
The Lancet
IF0
INSURGENT PLANNING: SITUATING RADICAL PLANNING IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH叛乱计划: 在全球南部进行激进计划
PLANNING THEORY
IF2.5
Digital Dissent: An Analysis of the Motivational Contents of Tweets From an Occupy Wall Street Demonstration
MOTIVATION SCIENCE
IF3.3


