arrow
返回

Presenting software engineering results using structured abstracts: a randomised experiment

delete2008-07-17
delete36
PRE
AI
D
David Budgen *
B
Barbara Kitchenham
S
Stuart Charters
M
Mark Turner
P
Pearl Brereton
S
Stephen Linkman
DOI:10.1007/s10664-008-9075-7delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
When conducting a systematic literature review, researchers usually determine the relevance of primary studies on the basis of the title and abstract. However, experience indicates that the abstracts for many software engineering papers are of too poor a quality to be used for this purpose. A solution adopted in other domains is to employ structured abstracts to improve the quality of information provided. This study consists of a formal experiment to investigate whether structured abstracts are more complete and easier to understand than non-structured abstracts for papers that describe software engineering experiments. We constructed structured versions of the abstracts for a random selection of 25 papers describing software engineering experiments. The 64 participants were each presented with one abstract in its original unstructured form and one in a structured form, and for each one were asked to assess its clarity (measured on a scale of 1 to 10) and completeness (measured with a questionnaire that used 18 items). Based on a regression analysis that adjusted for participant, abstract, type of abstract seen first, knowledge of structured abstracts, software engineering role, and preference for conventional or structured abstracts, the use of structured abstracts increased the completeness score by 6.65 (SE 0.37, p < 0.001) and the clarity score by 2.98 (SE 0.23, p < 0.001). 57 participants reported their preferences regarding structured abstracts: 13 (23%) had no preference; 40 (70%) preferred structured abstracts; four preferred conventional abstracts. Many conventional software engineering abstracts omit important information. Our study is consistent with studies from other disciplines and confirms that structured abstracts can improve both information content and readability. Although care must be taken to develop appropriate structures for different types of article, we recommend that Software Engineering journals and conferences adopt structured abstracts.
Keyword:
structured abstract
randomised controlled laboratory experiment
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Empirical Software Engineering 封面图
Empirical Software Engineering
IF:
3.6
论文数:
2.0K
被引数:
5.3K

机构

K
Keele University
学者数:
5.4K
论文数: 5.7K
被引数: 6.9K
D
Durham University
学者数:
1.3W
论文数: 1.5W
被引数: 2.1W
L
lincoln university - new zealand
学者数:
1.8K
论文数: 1.9K
被引数: 2
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

RF transceiver and wireless calibration of on-chip frequency reference for a true single chip radio
err2008-06-01
err0
PREAI
errY. Ding; Y. Su; C. Cao; J.-J. Lin; H. Wu; M. Hwang; R. Fox; J. E. Brewer; K. K. O
err分享
err收藏
err2003-01-01
err0
PREAI
errJ. Tack; G. Vantrappen; G. Huyberechts; D. Sifrim; J. Janssens; R. Van Overstraeten
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
A survey of controlled experiments in software engineering
err2005-09-01
err395
errOAAI
errSjoberg, DIK; Hannay, JE; Hansen, O; Kampenes, VB; Karahasanovic, A; Liborg, NK; Rekdal, AC
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容