返回
Process guidelines for establishing Intercoder Reliability in qualitative studies
DOI:10.1177/1468794115577012.png)
摘要
En 中文
Qualitative interviews are increasingly being utilized within the context of intervention trials. While there is emerging assistance for conducting and reporting qualitative analysis, there are limited practical resources available for researchers engaging in a group coding process and interested in ensuring adequate Intercoder Reliability (ICR); the amount of agreement between two or more coders for the codes applied to qualitative text. Assessing the reliability of the coding helps establish the credibility of qualitative findings. We discuss our experience calculating ICR in the context of a behavioural HIV prevention trial for young women in South Africa which involves multiple rounds of longitudinal qualitative data collection. We document the steps that we took to improve ICR in this study, the challenges to improving ICR, and the value of the process to qualitative data analysis. As a result, we provide guidelines for other researchers to consider as they embark on large qualitative projects.
Keyword:
coding
qualitative
qualitative analysis
reliability
research
software
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
2.9
论文数:
1.3K
被引数:
6.1K
机构
引用论文
Qualitative research in health care - Analysing qualitative data (Reprinted from Qualitative Research in Health Care)医疗保健中的定性研究-分析定性数据 (转载自医疗保健中的定性研究)
Coding In-depth Semistructured Interviews: Problems of Unitization and Intercoder Reliability and Agreement编码深入的半结构化访谈: uniization和Intercoder可靠性和协议的问题

