arrow
返回

Punishment

delete2014-07-03
delete20
PRE
AI
G
Geoffrey P. Goodwin *
D
Dena M. Gromet
DOI:10.1002/wcs.1301delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Retributivism is a deontological theory of punishment that calls for the deserved punishment of a guilty offender in proportion with his moral blameworthiness for a past offense. It is often referred to as punishment based on 'just deserts', and it contrasts with consequentialist theories that ground punishment in its potentially beneficial future consequences. Rich philosophical debate surrounds the appropriateness of retributivism. From a psychological perspective, the key question concerns whether retributivism underlies ordinary individuals' desire for the legal punishment of wrongdoers. Past research in social psychology has answered this question in the affirmative. However, much of this existing evidence requires a new look, because it is premised on a fundamental ambiguity. We review alternative evidence for the existence of retributive motives from lesser-known correlational studies, and from studies of the punishment of companies and animals. We also explore the links between retributivism and restorative justice-an alternative justice approach that focuses on repairing the harms caused by an offense. Although often cast as diametrically opposed to one another, retributive and restorative justice in fact share more in common than is often supposed. Both are premised on notions of deservingness, and their goals can be achieved by the same action (i.e., retributive punishment can restore victims). In all areas of the research we review, more work is needed to better understand: retributivism directed at human offenders, the commonalities and discontinuities between retributive and restorative justice, and how the notion of desert structures moral life and thought more generally. (C) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keyword:
RESTORATIVE JUSTICE
POLITICAL-IDEOLOGY
RETRIBUTION
TRANSGRESSIONS
SATISFACTION
PROSECUTION
INTUITIONS
ANIMALS
UTILITY
DESERT
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

W
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews and Cognitive Science
IF:
3.8
论文数:
613
被引数:
2.8K

机构

U
university of pennsylvania
学者数:
9.2W
论文数: 7.8W
被引数: 153
引用论文

引用论文

Ultrastructural and Real-time Microscopic Changes inP. falciparum-infected Red Blood Cells Following Treatment with Antimalarial Drugs
err2011-09-12
err0
errOAAI
errNavakanit Sachanonta; Kesinee Chotivanich; Urai Chaisri; Gareth D.H. Turner; David J.P. Ferguson; Nicholas P.J. Day; Emsri Pongponratn
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容