.png){kind=icon}
返回
REFORMS: Consensus-based Recommendations for Machine-learning-based Science
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1126/sciadv.adk3452.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Machine learning (ML) methods are proliferating in scientific research. However, the adoption of these methods has been accompanied by failures of validity, reproducibility, and generalizability. These failures can hinder scientific progress, lead to false consensus around invalid claims, and undermine the credibility of ML-based science. ML methods are often applied and fail in similar ways across disciplines. Motivated by this observation, our goal is to provide clear recommendations for conducting and reporting ML-based science. Drawing from an extensive review of past literature, we present the REFORMS checklist (recommendations for machine-learning-based science). It consists of 32 questions and a paired set of guidelines. REFORMS was developed on the basis of a consensus of 19 researchers across computer science, data science, mathematics, social sciences, and biomedical sciences. REFORMS can serve as a resource for researchers when designing and implementing a study, for referees when reviewing papers, and for journals when enforcing standards for transparency and reproducibility. We provide a checklist to improve reporting practices in ML-based science based on a review of best practices and common errors.
Keyword:
CROSS-VALIDATION
MISSING DATA
MODEL SELECTION
PREDICTION
QUALITY
HEALTH
REPRODUCIBILITY
PERFORMANCE
PSYCHOLOGY
TRIALS
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
12.5
论文数:
2.1W
被引数:
18.1W
机构
引用论文
分享收藏
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations在用于管理人群健康的算法中剖析种族偏见.png)
SCIENCEOAAI
SCIENCEIF45.8
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容