arrow
返回

Sample Processing Methods Impacts on Rumen Microbiome

delete2019-04-30
delete13
delete
OA
AI
G
G. Martı́nez *
S
Stuart E. Denman
C
Christopher S. McSweeney
DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00861delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
The standardization of collection and processing methods for rumen samples is crucial to reduce the level of errors that may affect the analysis and interpretation of the data. The aim of this study was to compare two processing methods and their impacts on the microbial community composition analysis, from material that was either immediately frozen or samples that were stored as cell pellets after removing the supernatant prior to freezing. Eight rumen-fistulated Brahman steers received chloroform as an antimethanogenic compound for 21 days. Rumen fluid samples (60 mL per animal) were collected using a probe covered with two layers of cheesecloth at 3 h post feeding at day 0 prior-treatment (control period) and day 21 of treatment. One sub-set of samples were placed in dry ice and stored at -80 degrees C (Method 1) for subsequent DNA extraction, while a second subset of samples was centrifuged, the supernatant removed and the microbial pellet and rumen contents placed in dry ice and stored at -80 degrees C (Method 2) prior to DNA extractions. Phylogenetic based methods (Illumina Miseq) targeting the 16S rRNA gene were used to characterize the bacterial and archaeal communities from both collection methods for the control and treatment periods. The results from this study showed that the chloroform treatment was significantly different for all beta diversity measures regardless of the processing method used. Significant differences in the relative abundances of some bacteria and archaea, such as Elusimicrobia, Fibrobacteres, Lentisphaerae, Spirochaetes, and Verrucomicrobia and Methanomassiliicoccaceae, were observed at higher levels in the Method 2. These microbial populations are known to have fragile cell wall structures and are susceptible to cell lysis. Regardless of the processing method used, both identified the key microbial groups and can be used to compare the relative shifts in the rumen microbiome between treatments. However, immediately freezing samples might alter the abundance of material from species that are more readily lysed and will not be suitable for studies that aim to assign absolute abundance values to these species within the rumen.
Keyword:
rumen
microbial community
DNA
16S sequencing
sample
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Frontiers in Microbiology 封面图
Frontiers in Microbiology
IF:
4.5
论文数:
4.0W
被引数:
16.6W

机构

C
引用论文

引用论文

err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
The Bacterial Cell Envelope细菌细胞包膜
err2010-04-14
err2.8K
errOAAI
errSilhavy, Thomas J.; Kahne, Daniel; Walker, Suzanne
err分享
err收藏
Methane Inhibition Alters the Microbial Community, Hydrogen Flow, and Fermentation Response in the Rumen of Cattle
err2016-07-19
err103
errOAAI
errMartinez-Fernandez, Gonzalo; Denman, Stuart E.; Yang, Chunlei; Cheung, Jane; Mitsumori, Makoto; McSweeney, Christopher S.
err分享
err收藏
Rumen Bacterial Community Composition in Holstein and Jersey Cows Is Different under Same Dietary Condition and Is Not Affected by Sampling Method
err2016-08-03
err173
errOAAI
errPaz, Henry A.; Anderson, Christopher L.; Muller, Makala J.; Kononoff, Paul J.; Fernando, Samodha C.
err分享
err收藏
Comparative genomics highlights the unique biology of Methanomassiliicoccales, a Thermoplasmatales-related seventh order of methanogenic archaea that encodes pyrrolysine
err2014-08-13
err237
errOAAI
errBorrel, Guillaume; Parisot, Nicolas; Harris, Hugh M. B.; Peyretaillade, Eric; Gaci, Nadia; Tottey, William; Bardot, Olivier; Raymann, Kasie; Gribaldo, Simonetta; Peyret, Pierre; O'Toole, Paul W.; Brugere, Jean-Francois
err分享
err收藏
The Fibrobacteres: an Important Phylum of Cellulose-Degrading Bacteria
err2012-01-03
err303
PREAI
errRansom-Jones, Emma; Jones, David L.; McCarthy, Alan J.; McDonald, James E.
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容