返回
Saving Shared Decision-Making
DOI:10.1007/s11606-025-09410-z.png)
摘要
En 中文
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality encouraged a re-examination of the concept, process, and measurement of shared decision-making (SDM) in 2016. Progress, however, has been slow. One illustrative example is SDM's relationship with the concept of equipoise: there remains little consensus on what equipoise means in the context of SDM, creating confusion about when SDM is and is not indicated. In this paper, we describe the ways in which this focus on equipoise in SDM is counter-productive and argue that equipoise is neither a necessary nor sufficient criterion in determining the need for SDM. Moreover, we suggest that what is needed to move the field of SDM forward is a shift away from focusing on when SDM is needed to instead focusing on how best to accomplish SDM across a variety of contexts by advancing the science of SDM implementation.
Keyword:
shared decision-making
health communication
patient preference
medical ethics
期刊
IF:
4.2
论文数:
1.3W
被引数:
3.8W
机构
引用论文
Techno-Economic Evaluation of Jet Fuel Production via an Alternative Gasification-Driven Biomass-to-Liquid Pathway and Benchmarking with the State-of-the-Art Fischer–Tropsch and Alcohol-to-Jet Concepts
Energies
IF0
Patient-doctor decision-making about treatment within the consultation - A critical analysis of models患者-医生在咨询中关于治疗的决策-模型的批判性分析
Environmental Inequalities in Ecosystem Services Benefits of Green Infrastructure: A Case Study from China
Forests
IF0
2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA慢性冠心病患者管理指南: 美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会临床实践指南联合委员会的报告
CIRCULATION
IF38.6


