.png){kind=icon}
返回
Self-Reports, Peer Ratings and Construct Validity
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1002/per.751.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Self-reports of behaviour have been criticized as fraught with problems that seriously undermine the construct validity of conventional personality measures The problems are related to a putative absence of or distortion of a person's knowledge about himself or herself A proposed solution is to use peer reports of personality instead, because such observer ratings are presumably more impartial and free of the distorting influences affecting self-reports. We review some past research On moderators of the agreement between self reports and peer ratings of personality, arguing that those findings support the validity of self-ratings We conclude that peer ratings, although highly useful as adjuncts to other methods of assessment, are no substitute for self-reports as a source of personality information Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Keyword:
personality scales and inventories
peer ratings, person perception, construct validity
期刊
IF:
3.7
论文数:
1.5K
被引数:
4.8K
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
Valuing thoughts, ignoring behavior: The introspection illusion as a source of the bias blind spot
PREAI
分享收藏
分享收藏分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容