.png){kind=icon}
返回
Six practical recommendations for improved implementation outcomes reporting
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1186/s13012-021-01183-3.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Background Implementation outcomes research spans an exciting mix of fields, disciplines, and geographical space. Although the number of studies that cite the 2011 taxonomy has expanded considerably, the problem of harmony in describing outcomes persists. This paper revisits that problem by focusing on the clarity of reporting outcomes in studies that examine them. Published recommendations for improved reporting and specification have proven to be an important step in enhancing the rigor of implementation research. We articulate reporting problems in the current implementation outcomes literature and describe six practical recommendations that address them. Recommendations Our first recommendation is to clearly state each implementation outcome and provide a definition that the study will consistently use. This includes providing an explanation if using the taxonomy in a new way or merging terms. Our second recommendation is to specify how each implementation outcome will be analyzed relative to other constructs. Our third recommendation is to specify the thing that each implementation outcome will be measured in relation to. This is especially important if you are concurrently studying interventions and strategies, or if you are studying interventions and strategies that have multiple components. Our fourth recommendation is to report who will provide data and the level at which data will be collected for each implementation outcome, and to report what kind of data will be collected and used to assess each implementation outcome. Our fifth recommendation is to state the number of time points and frequency at which each outcome will be measured. Our sixth recommendation is to state the unit of observation and the level of analysis for each implementation outcome. Conclusion This paper advances implementation outcomes research in two ways. First, we illustrate elements of the 2011 research agenda with concrete examples drawn from a wide swath of current literature. Second, we provide six pragmatic recommendations for improved reporting. These recommendations are accompanied by an audit worksheet and a list of exemplar articles that researchers can use when designing, conducting, and assessing implementation outcomes studies.
Keyword:
Acceptability
Adoption
Appropriateness
Feasibility
Fidelity
Implementation cost
Penetration
Sustainability
Implementation outcome
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
13.4
论文数:
2.2K
被引数:
2.0W
机构
引用论文
分享收藏CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trialsCONSORT 2010解释和阐述: 报告平行组随机试验的更新指南OAAI
OAAI分享收藏Systematic review of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework.png)
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCEOAAI
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCEIF13.4
OAAI分享收藏Comprehensive Cost Analysis of First Step Next for Preschoolers with Disruptive Behavior Disorder: Using Real-World Intervention Data to Estimate Costs at ScalePREVENTION SCIENCE
PREVENTION SCIENCEIF2.7
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容